Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343480›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

AttentionDriveNet: Fusion of deep cognitive network with Attention modeling for robust navigation in Self-driving vehicles.

Sushruta Mishra, Rishabh Mohata, Hrudaya Kumar Tripathy, Jnyana Ranjan Mohanty, Kshira Sagar Sahoo, N Z Jhanjhi, Abdullah Alourani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sushruta MishraSchool of Computer Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Rishabh MohataSchool of Computer Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Hrudaya Kumar TripathySchool of Computer Engineering, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Jnyana Ranjan MohantySchool of Computer Application, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Kshira Sagar SahooDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM University-AP, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
N Z JhanjhiSchool of Computer Science, SCS Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8116-4733
Abdullah AlouraniDepartment of Management Information Systems, College of Business and Economics, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-3677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-driving vehicles are envisioned as automated and safety-focused vehicles facilitating smooth movement on roads. This research proposes a novel, robust, and intelligent navigation framework for such vehicles through an integrated fusion of advanced technologies like predictive analytics with remote sensing and detection for accurate obstacle/object detection. TaskTrek, ViewVerse, and RuleRise form the core of the essential model governing vehicle-environment interaction. TaskTrek handles kinematic trajectory synthesis and space-time traffic modeling, ViewVerse provides LiDAR-based volumetric perception and radar-assisted navigational intelligence, and RuleRise manages topological localization, vehicle actuation, and autonomous decision-making through multimodal sensory fusion. The model applies an iterative Multi-FacBiNet method, which uses the cognitive Fully Convolutional Neural Network (FCNN) method to detect and classify obstacles during vehicle movement on the road. Upon stimulation during vehicle movement, the model provided an encouraging outcome. The fusion of predictive intelligence, Radar, and sensing technologies gave 95.3% proficiency. Minimum obstacle detection, processing, and response delays of 0.116 seconds, 0.105 seconds, and 0.36 seconds, respectively, are recorded. The computed mean obstacle detection accuracy for right, left, front and back camera angles are 88.3%, 83.8%, 91.4%, and 89.9%, respectively. Further, a comprehensive analysis of the model's performance in different on-road scenarios considering metrics like traffic load, road type, and region density was done. The model generated a very impressive accuracy of obstacle detection on all parameters. The results of this study not only aid in accelerating the development of precise navigation-enabled self-driving vehicles but also in the context of environmentally friendly mobility/motion tracking solutions.

Indexed as

AttentionAutomobile DrivingNeural Networks, ComputerHumansRadar

Identifiers

PMID41343480
PMCPMC12677449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.