Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343469›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Where to invest in neonatal survival programs in Nepal? A modelling study using Lives Saved Tool through scaling key interventions.

Geha Nath Khanal, Nisha Giri, Deepak Jha, Dipak Raj Chaulagain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Geha Nath KhanalNepal Public Health Association, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0920-3739
Nisha GiriNursing Association of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Deepak JhaDepartment of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Population, Family Welfare Division, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dipak Raj ChaulagainInstitute for Implementation Science and Health, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal survival remains a major public health priority in many low and middle-income countries including Nepal, where the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) is 21 per 1,000 live births. To improve the neonatal health outcomes, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends scaling up coverage of quality antenatal care (ANC), skilled care at birth, immediate essential newborn care and resuscitation, postnatal care for mother and newborn, and specialized care of small and sick newborns. In this context, we aimed to estimate the potential impact of achieving the coverage targets for 35 interventions, identified as monitoring indicators under Nepal's Every Newborn Action Plan (NENAP), on neonatal survival in Nepal by 2035.

methodsWe used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to estimate the number of neonatal deaths that could be prevented by 2035 if target intervention coverage level is achieved, starting from 2025 baseline values. Baseline data were drawn from demographic and health (DHS) survey and multiple indicator cluster survey (MICS). Where survey data were unavailable, proxy estimates were derived from available literatures to establish the baseline levels.

resultsBy 2035, achieving the target coverage level could save an estimated 8,126 neonatal lives compared to the 2025 baseline. This achievement would reduce the NMR to about 14 per 1,000 live births and avert an additional 5,977 child deaths and 358 maternal deaths. More than two-third (70.4%) of neonatal lives saved would be attributable to four priority interventions: neonatal resuscitation (36.0%), promotion of breastfeeding practices (11.8%), case management of neonatal sepsis (11.7%) and case management of premature babies (10.9%). At this coverage level, approximately 26.9% of deaths due to prematurity, 17.9% from sepsis, and 16.1% from diarrhoea could be prevented.

conclusionNepal must prioritize highly effective interventions: neonatal resuscitation, breastfeeding, management of neonatal sepsis and case management of premature babies to accelerate progress towards the NENAP target. Our analysis indicates that achieving the specific coverage targets of 35 NENAP interventions could reduce the NMR to 14 per 1,000 live births which fall short of the NENAP targets of reducing NMR to 11 per 1,000 live births by 2035. Strengthening special newborn care unit (SNCU) in line with WHO standard is critical to improving the quality of care for small and sick newborns (SSNB) in health facilities. While strengthening newborn resuscitation and SNCU services will substantially reduce NMR, attaining the NENAP targets will ultimately require comprehensive health system reforms and effective coverage of other maternal and newborn interventions.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNepalPregnancyPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID41343469
PMCPMC12677573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.