ArticlePloS one2025
Artificial intelligence based personalized student feedback system -Sisu Athwala' to enhance exam performance of medical undergraduates.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the research landscape of virtual reality and artificial intelligence in medical education evaluation: A bibliometric analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in medical education: from knowledge assessment to clinical reasoning and professional competence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The impact of AI precision feedback on college students' thinking shaping ability: mediating effect of intrinsic value identification and moderating role of critical consciousness transformation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn medical education, mentoring and feedback play crucial roles. Providing feedback on exam performance is a vital component as it allows students to improve. Feedback has to be tailor made and specific to the individual student. This needs lot of time and human resources, which are always not in abundance. Use of artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising proposition yet it comes with the integral problem of generating inaccurate responses by the Large language models (LLM). To alleviate and minimize this, we have developed our unique model 'Sisu Athwala' using retrieval augment generation (RAG) with custom LLM's.
objectiveTo design and implement an AI-based tool using RAG to provide customized feedback to medical students to enhance their exam performance, minimizing the risk of generating inaccurate responses by the LLM's. To evaluate the AI tool by expert student mentors and by the end users.
methodsThe study was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. An AI based feedback tool was developed powered by Generative Pre-trained Transformers-4 (GPT-4) LLM using a RAG pipeline. Expert instruction sets were used to develop the data base through embedding model to minimize potential inaccuracies and biases. To generate user queries, students were provided with a self-evaluation form which was processed using Representative Vector Summarization (RVS). Hence most critical concerns of each student are distilled and captured accurately, minimizing noise or irrelevant details. The role of the AI tool was defined as a counsellor during Pre-processional alignment allowing professional manner throughout the interaction. User queries were processed using Open AI Application Programming Interface (API), utilizing GPT-4-turbo LLM. Students were invited to engage in conversations with the newly developed feedback tool. The AI tool was evaluated by the expert student mentors, as per its ability to give personalized feedback, use varied language expressions, and to introduce novel perspectives to students. End user perception on the use of AI tool was assessed using a questionnaire.
resultsPost implementation end user survey of the Sisu Athwala AI tool was largely positive. 92% mentioned the advices given by the tool on stress management were helpful. 60% believed that the study techniques suggested were useful. While further 60% thought they are comfortable using the tool. 52% find the advices on exam performances were helpful. In their open comments some suggested to have the tool as a mobile APP. 15 expert student mentors took part in evaluating the tool. 100% agreed that it effectively addressed key points of student strengths and identifies areas for improvements going by the Pendleton model. 90% agreed that Sisu- Athwala gives clear actionable plans.
conclusionSisu Athwala AI tool provided comprehensive tailor made feedback and guidance to medical students which was well received by the end users. Expert student mentors evaluation of the material generated by the AI tool were quite positive. Though this is not a replacement for human mentors it supports mentoring to be delivered circumventing the human resource constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.