ArticlePloS one2025
Prognostic value of laboratory markers and clinical scores for mortality in intensive care unit patients with sepsis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Circulating C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 4 to Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes in Sepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Safety recommendations on laboratory and blood count values for early mobilization in critically ill adults: an expert consensus.Critical care science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis is a life-threatening condition, especially for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), where early identification of the prognosis is critical. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inflammatory markers, clinical scores, and specific laboratory findings for predicting ICU and in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult patients with sepsis who were admitted to the ICU of a university hospital between September 2019 and December 2022. To minimize selection bias, all eligible patients during the study period were consecutively included. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and included demographics, clinical characteristics, inflammatory markers, and clinical scores such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). The primary outcomes were ICU and in-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of mortality.
resultsA total of 213 ICU patients with sepsis were included in the study. The patients were 62.0% male with a mean age of 73.1 ± 12.6 years. The ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were 29.6% and 36.6%, respectively. Non-survivors had higher clinical severity scores and poorer nutritional and perfusion profiles than survivors. Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated lactate levels (a marker of tissue hypoperfusion) and higher SAPS 3 scores were independently associated with ICU mortality. For in-hospital mortality, lower albumin levels and higher SAPS 3 scores were significant predictors.
conclusionsHigh lactate and SAPS 3 scores were independent predictors of mortality, while higher albumin levels showed a potential protective effect. Early identification of these factors may aid in the management of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.