ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2026
Remote alcohol administration: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to potential participation.
Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human laboratory alcohol administration studies are crucial for advancing knowledge of cognitive processes and behaviors that precede alcohol consequences in a controlled environment, improving our understanding of etiology of alcohol problems and ability to develop and test safety and efficacy of interventions. However, conducting lab administration studies is challenging in part due to high participant burden, limiting generalizability of results to individuals who do not typically present for lab studies. Given the advantages of lab administration methods coupled with their challenges, remote alcohol administration was pursued as an alternative to enhance generalizability by removing barriers to participation and reducing participant burden. To establish feasibility and acceptability of this new remote method, we conducted qualitative interviews of 27 individuals (51.8% male;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.