Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343211›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Travel From Native Lands to US Abortion Facilities Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.

Rebecca Hailu Astatke, Lauren van Schilfgaarde, Miriam Jorgensen, Laura E Dodge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca Hailu AstatkeDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lauren van SchilfgaardeUniversity of California, Los Angeles School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles.
Miriam JorgensenUdall Center for Studies in Public Policy, Native Nations Institute at the University of Arizona, Tucson.
Laura E DodgeDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Limited evidence exists concerning access to abortion facilities from Native lands. To address this gap, travel times from Native lands to abortion facilities before and after the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) decision were compared. Objective: To compare travel times to abortion facilities from Native lands before and after the Dobbs decision. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study, conducted from July 1, 2023, to September 30, 2025, measured the proportion of Native lands served by abortion facilities (coverage) and the minimum travel times to abortion facilities. For coverage, the census-designated Native lands (N = 650) within and outside 30-, 60-, and 90-minute drive times to an abortion facility were quantified. For minimum travel, the drive times from Tribal headquarters (N = 577) and Native land population-weighted centroids (N = 650) to the nearest facility were estimated. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the estimates of the median travel time from Native lands to the nearest abortion facility and the pre- and post-Dobbs differences in the contiguous US. Primary analyses compared median drive times in the contiguous US before and after Dobbs. The pre-Dobbs period included facilities active in 2021, while the post-Dobbs period excluded facilities in states with total abortion bans (n = 14) or total or 6-week bans (n = 16) in effect as of October 31, 2023. For Alaska and Hawaii, Euclidean distance was estimated to account for varied travel modes; because no such bans were imposed, pre- and post-Dobbs differences were not examined. Results: Across 650 Native lands, with an estimated 950 991 female residents of reproductive age (15-44 years), less than half (289 [44.5%]) were within a 90-minute drive of any abortion facility after Dobbs. In the contiguous US, the median drive time significantly increased from 65.5 minutes (IQR, 31.9-103.1 minutes) before Dobbs to 72.3 minutes (IQR, 32.5-147.3 minutes) (total bans only) and 74.0 minutes (IQR, 32.6-152.4 minutes) (total and 6-week bans) after Dobbs. The median distance was 470.1 km (IQR, 270.7-665.9 km) in Alaska and 63.1 km (IQR, 22.9-179.1 km) in Hawaii, where 56.4% of Native lands (31 of 55) required travel to a different island. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of access to abortion facilities from Native lands found that individuals on Native lands faced disproportionately long travel times to abortion facilities, which became longer after Dobbs. Addressing these inequities is critical for advancing health equity for Indigenous communities.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedHealth Services AccessibilityTravelAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyTime FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41343211
PMCPMC12679323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.