Observational studyJournal of global health2025
Key features of sustainable capacities for risk communication in health emergencies: analysis of Joint External Evaluation.
Observational study in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Risk communication is a fundamental component of public health resilience during health emergencies. While the Joint External Evaluation (JEE) framework established by the World Health Organization under the International Health Regulations assesses risk communication capacity, cross-country comparisons to identify good practices that could inform improvements in global risk communication remain unexamined. We aim to identify the key elements of effective risk communication practices by analysing high-scoring countries in JEE mission reports. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using publicly available JEE mission reports from 103 countries that had completed evaluations as of October 2022. Using a five-point evaluation scale, we defined good practices as highlighted strengths in risk communication for indicators reflecting 'demonstrated capacity' (score four) or 'sustainable capacity' (score five). We documented the JEE-assessed countries and score descriptions to contextualise good practice identification. We performed a cluster analysis of the extracted good practices to identify the recurring themes and key elements across five risk communication indicators. Results: We identified 420 good practices and coded them based on the JEE technical questions. Frequently cited key elements included 'clear roles and responsibilities', 'regular testing and exercises', 'dedicated staff and funding', and 'feedback mechanisms from the audience'. Additionally, innovative approaches such as 'rumour monitoring systems' and 'digital literacy education' were identified, thus providing insights into practical strategies for effective risk communication during health emergencies. Conclusions: This analysis of JEE mission reports highlights the key features of sustainable risk communication capacities. By identifying key elements that can inform the development of risk communication strategies, we offer insights to help countries enhance systems and strengthen public health resilience in the face of future emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.