ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2026
Treatment Interruption and Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Chemotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Carcinomas
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Concurrent Accelerated Radiation and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Accelerated Radiation, Cisplatin, and Cetuximab (C225) [Followed by Surgery for Selected Patients] for Stage III and IV Head and Neck Carcinomas
Phase III Trial of Radiotherapy Plus Cetuximab Versus Chemoradiotherapy in HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Co-Morbid Immunocompromise in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Article
- Regimen-Related Oral Mucosal Injury: Pathobiology, Clinical Consequences and Rationale for Intervention Across Cancer Treatment Modalities.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Exploratory Analysis of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Mucositis Severity in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy-Based Treatment: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pre-radiotherapy cachexia is associated with treatment discontinuation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Historical evidence demonstrated that delays or interruptions in radiotherapy (RT) are associated with poorer oncologic outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Substantial concerns arose during the COVID-19 pandemic, when treatment schedules were frequently disrupted. Objective: To determine the association of RT interruptions with locoregional failure (LRF) and overall survival (OS). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective review and secondary analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials (NRG/RTOG 0129, 0522, and 1016) included patients enrolled in the trials who were treated with RT. Patients with HNSCC were grouped as (1) p16-positive oropharynx (p16+ OPSCC) and (2) p16-negative oropharynx and all other subsites regardless of p16 status (called locally advanced HNSCC [LAHNSCC])). Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess the association of an RT interruption (binary model) and length of RT interruption (continuous model) with LRF and OS. Exposures: Presence of RT interruption. Main Outcomes and Measures: LRF and OS. Results: There were 1549 patients (200 female patients [12.9%]; mean [SD] age, 57 [6] years; 1048 p16+ OPSCC [67.7%]; 501 LAHNSCC [32.3%]) who were included in the binary model; 439 (28.3%) had RT interruption. There were 1083 patients (69.9%) with available length of RT interruption (continuous model). A binary RT interruption was associated with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90-1.36) for LRF and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.99-1.50) for OS. As a continuous predictor, each 7-day interruption corresponded to HRs of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.12-1.89) for LRF and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.07-1.86) for OS. Analyses did not indicate effect modification by p16 status, and results are presented from models that estimated the effect of RT interruption across both groups. Using covariate-adjusted predictions from models that included clinical and tumor characteristics, a mean 7-day interruption in RT was associated with a 3-year LRF decrement of 4.1% in p16+ OPSCC and 9.1% in LAHNSCC. Predicted 3-year LRF detriment due to RT interruption ranged from 2.0% for a patient with non-T4, non-N3, p16+ OPSCC to 11.2% for a patients with LAHNSCC with a T4N3 p16-negative cancer. Conclusions and Relevance: The secondary analysis suggests that RT treatment interruptions may be negatively associated with LRF and OS in HNSCC, but the magnitude of the association varies depending on p16 status and clinical characteristics. While treatment interruptions should globally be discouraged, patients with LAHNSCC or higher-stage disease may be most affected. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00047008; NCT00265941; NCT01302834.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.