Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343123›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Glioblastoma survival prediction through MRI and clinical data integration with transfer learning.

A Marasi, D Milesi, D Aquino, F M Doniselli, R Pascuzzo, M Grisoli, A Redaelli, E De Momi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A MarasiDepartment of Electronic, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-5222
D MilesiDepartment of Electronic, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
D AquinoNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
F M DoniselliNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy. fabio.doniselli@istituto-besta.it.
R PascuzzoNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
M GrisoliNeuroradiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
A RedaelliDepartment of Electronic, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
E De MomiDepartment of Electronic, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute T4-AN.09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate prediction of overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma patients is critical for advancing personalized treatments and improving clinical trial design. Conventional radiomics approaches rely on manually engineered features, which limit their ability to capture complex, high-dimensional imaging patterns. This study employs a deep learning architecture to process MRI data for automated glioma segmentation and feature extraction, leveraging high-level representations from the encoder's latent space.

methodsMultimodal MRI data from the BraTS2020 dataset and a proprietary dataset from Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (Milan, Italy) were processed independently using a U-Net-like model pre-trained on BraTS2018 and fine-tuned on BraTS2020. Features extracted from the encoder's latent space represented hierarchical imaging patterns. These features were combined with clinical variable (patient's age) and reduced via principal component analysis (PCA) to enhance computational efficiency. Machine learning classifiers-including random forest, XGBoost, and a fully connected neural network-were trained on the reduced feature vectors for OS classification.

resultsIn the four-modality BraTS4CH setting, the multi-layer perceptron achieved the best performance (F1 = 0.71, AUC = 0.74, accuracy = 0.71). When limited to two modalities on BraTS2020 (BraTS2CH), MLP again led (F1 = 0.67, AUC = 0.70, accuracy = 0.67). On the IRCCS Besta two-modality cohort (Besta2CH), XGBoost produced the highest F1-score and accuracy (F1 = 0.65, accuracy = 0.66), while MLP obtained the top AUC (0.70). These results are competitive with-and in some metrics exceed-state-of-the-art reports, demonstrating the robustness and scalability of our automated framework relative to traditional radiomics and AI-driven approaches.

conclusionIntegrating encoder-derived features from multimodal MRI data with clinical variables offers a scalable and effective approach for OS prediction in glioblastoma patients. This study demonstrates the potential of deep learning to address traditional radiomics limitations, paving the way for more precise and personalized prognostic tools.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGlioblastomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisDeep learningGlioblastomaMultimodal MRIOverall survival prediction

Identifiers

PMID41343123
PMCPMC13035620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.