Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343101›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in MSI-H/dMMR Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Prospective Trials Evaluating Efficacy, Pathologic Response, and Surgical Outcomes.

Wajahat Mirza, Mehak Ejaz Khan, Hania Iqbal, Alishbah Khan, Muhammad Bilal Moeen-Ud-Din, Hadi Mohammad Khan, Sundas Dadan

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wajahat MirzaShifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-E-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan. wajahatmirza.clinicalresearch@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9811-7754
Mehak Ejaz KhanResident General Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hania IqbalResident General Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Alishbah KhanResident General Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Bilal Moeen-Ud-DinDepartment of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Hadi Mohammad KhanConsultant General Surgeon, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sundas DadanSenior Research Associate, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancers demonstrate exceptional responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, evidence for the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy remains limited. This review consolidates all prospective trials evaluating neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in non-metastatic dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer.

methodsThis systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD420251074066). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until May 2025. Prospective interventional studies involving neoadjuvant immunotherapy in adults with stage II-III dMMR/MSI-H colorectal adenocarcinoma were included in this review. The primary outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and clinical complete response (cCR). The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool.

resultsEight prospective phase 2 trials encompassing 352 patients with stage II-III dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer were included. The pCR rates ranged from 41 to 90%, with the highest responses in patients with colon cancer receiving dual checkpoint blockade (nivolumab plus ipilimumab: 90% pCR, 95% MPR). In rectal cancer, 100% of patients receiving dostarlimab (n = 16) and 46% of those in the camrelizumab plus apatinib group (n = 24/52) achieved cCR with organ preservation. MPR was observed in 80-95% of the studies. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 3-34% of patients, with no treatment-related deaths reported. At the median follow-up (8-26 months), disease-free survival exceeded 98% in most cohorts. Watch-and-wait strategies are durable, with no local regrowth in patients with complete clinical response (cCR).

conclusionsNeoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition demonstrates high pathological and clinical response rates in dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer, with organ preservation achievable in selected rectal cancer patients. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy may become an alternative to surgery as the primary treatment for MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer if long-term quality of life is superior and toxicity and cost are competitive with standard surgical approaches. However, longer follow-up, predictive biomarkers, and randomized comparisons with upfront surgery are required before its routine clinical use.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoadjuvant TherapyClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDNA Mismatch RepairHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsColorectal CancerDeficient Mismatch RepairImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMicrosatellite InstabilityNeoadjuvant ImmunotherapySystematic Review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.