ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Neurological immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: clinical and hematological risk factors.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe Immune-Related Neurological Adverse Events Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Adebrelimab-associated suspected immune-related myocarditis with myositis/myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome (IM3OS): A rapidly fatal case and clinical implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, but can induce neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs).
objectiveWe aimed at evaluating the occurrence and characteristics of n-irAEs in cancer patients treated with ICIs and identifying biomarkers predictive of such complications in a single-center case-control study in the USA.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records for all patients treated with ICIs at the University of Cincinnati in 2011-2023. Demographic and clinical data were gathered for patients who experienced at least one n-irAE. Logistic regression was conducted to assess the associated factors for n-irAEs.
resultsTwenty-eight (1.5%)/1817 patients who received ICI developed n-irAEs. Compared to those who did not, n-irAEs patients were older (median age, 75 vs 68 years; p < 0.001), male (75%, vs 56% p = 0.04), more likely to have used more than one ICI drug (36% vs 15%, p = 0.015), and had higher absolute eosinophil count before the first infusion (159 [75-251] vs 94 [37-194] cells/uL, p = 0.039). The most common cancer site was melanoma among cases (43%) and lungs in controls (31%, p < 0.001; non-small cell lung cancer, 73%). Neuropathy (34.4%) and encephalitis (18.8%) were the most common n-irAEs. Three subjects died of n-irAEs complications. Sixteen/28 cases (57%) improved at follow-up after ICIs discontinuation. The median time to n-irAEs after ICI administration was 68 (30-473) days.
conclusionN-irAEs are rare, serious, and potentially reversible complications of ICIs, occurring in the early treatment phase. Older age, male sex, multiple ICI therapies, and higher absolute eosinophil count before first infusion are associated with n-irAEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41343087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.