ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Joint-preserving corrective reconstruction strategy for malunions of tibial pilon fractures in young patients.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalunions of tibial pilon fractures pose significant challenges for corrective reconstruction due to the solidly healed displaced fracture fragments and frequently defective articular cartilage. This study aims to introduce a joint-preserving reconstruction strategy for managing tibial pilon fracture malunions in young patients and to evaluate the clinical outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 39 patients (mean age: 32.7 ± 10.4 years) with malunions of tibial pilon fractures who were treated with corrective reconstruction surgeries from 2013 to 2021. This cohort included 11 patients who underwent corrective intra-articular osteotomy, 17 who received combined osteoperiosteal iliac autograft transplantation, and 11 who underwent combined osteochondral autograft transplantation. The median duration from the initial injury to joint-preserving treatment was 7.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.4-11.1). Radiographic assessments included plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, and ankle range of motion (ROM).
resultsAfter a median follow-up of 41.5 months, patients showed significant improvements in pain and function. The median VAS score improved from 5 (IQR, 6-7) to 2 (IQR, 1-3), and the median AOFAS score increased from 42 (IQR, 33-58) to 79 (IQR, 73-87) (P < 0.001). The mean SF-36 scores increased from 37.2 ± 12.2 to 71.2 ± 9.6 (P < 0.001), and the median ankle ROM improved from 20 degrees (IQR, 16-30) to 25 degrees (IQR, 20-34) (P = 0.004). Major complications included two patients requiring reoperation, and two patients progressing to radiographic end-stage arthritis; however, the pain remained tolerable, and no secondary arthrodesis or arthroplasty was performed by the final follow-up.
conclusionJoint-preserving corrective reconstruction surgeries can offer reasonable improvement over a four-year follow-up period, making them a viable alternative for the reconstruction of tibial pilon fractures malunions in young patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41343082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.