ArticleDysphagia2026
Swallowing and QoL Outcomes, Patient Experience and Treatment Related Priorities in Recurrent Oropharyngeal Cancer (rOPC)- a Mixed Method Study.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent oropharyngeal cancer (rOPC) presents challenging treatment decision-making. Toxicity from previous treatment, coupled with potential functional and quality of life (QoL) morbidity of further treatment(s) can influence decision-making regarding curative and non-curative treatment.
aimTo investigate swallowing and QoL outcomes, treatment-related priorities, and patient experience before and after rOPC treatment.
methodLongitudinal, multicentre, mixed method study. Outcomes included the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN), the University of Washington QoL Questionnaire (UWQoLv4), the Chicago Priority Scale (CPS) and semi-structured interviews.
resultsThe sample included 37 participants (prospective n = 25, retrospective n = 12, females n = 6) with a median age of 63 (range 41-88). The majority (n = 21) had curative intent treatment (surgery n = 20 or radiation n = 1). The remainder had non-curative intent immunotherapy (n = 14) or chemotherapy (n = 2). Swallowing and QoL were impaired at baseline; median MDADI composite score: 60 (IQR: 52.15-81.75), median PSS- HN normalcy of diet: (NoD): 50 and UWQoLv4 global health score (GHS): 60 (IQR 40-60). The PSS-HN NoD score deteriorated to 40 at six months. The MDADI and UWQoL data remained impaired. Triangulation with qualitative data revealed agreement with the PSS data and provided context for the relatively stable QoL. Being cured of cancer and living as long as possible remained the key priorities at all timepoints.
conclusionIn this study swallowing deteriorated with treatment for rOPC. Treatment-related priorities remained focused on cure or survival. If the treatment-related goal was achieved, patients adapted and experienced at least stable QoL regardless of swallowing status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.