ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Characteristics and outcomes of pharmacy-supported transitions of care interventions in emergency departments: a scoping review.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Codesigning a pharmacist-led transition of care program in the emergency department: a qualitative participatory study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTransitions of care (ToC) services are essential for maintaining care continuity. The complex and fast-paced nature of care and high patient turnover in emergency departments (EDs) create unique challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care. Although the benefits of pharmacy-supported ToC interventions are established in non-ED settings, there is a lack of evidence exploring their characteristics and outcomes in EDs.
aimWe aimed to identify and present the available evidence regarding the characteristics and outcomes of pharmacy-supported ToC interventions beyond medication reconciliation, as the sole intervention, in EDs.
methodThis review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and grey literature from their inception until 22/12/24. The search included terms related to pharmacy, transitional care, and EDs. Data was extracted using a custom tool adapted from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist, which was used to assess the articles' compliance with the items.
resultsA total of 64 publications were included. Most studies (n = 58) enrolled adult patients, with 13 focusing on older adults. Most interventions were delivered by pharmacists in collaboration with other healthcare providers in 64% of studies. Interventions were most implemented post-discharge (54.7%), followed by arrival to the ED (42.2%). Around 90.6% of interventions included two or more activities, combining medication reconciliation, discharge planning, and follow-up care. Most studies focused on health utilization metrics (e.g., readmission rates) as their outcomes (28.8%). Positive effects were observed on medication safety, antibiotic stewardship, patient satisfaction, and resource use. However, pediatric populations and intrahospital transitions were underrepresented.
conclusionThis scoping review highlights the potential of pharmacist-supported transitional care interventions within EDs. The role of pharmacists in ToC interventions in emergency settings is evidently growing. Despite this, critical gaps persist in reporting and implementing these interventions. Future research is needed to systematically explore such initiatives and evaluate their implementation and long-term impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.