ArticleCognitive processing2026
Visuospatial or verbal-spatial codes? The different effect of two secondary tasks on the power-space associations during two explicit power judgment tasks.
Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The power-space associations are widely discussed in the field of concept representations, with two coding systems proposed to explain this phenomenon: the verbal-spatial and visuospatial codes. However, it remains unclear whether these two coding systems are always activated in all situations, or whether they are context-dependent. To address these problems, the current study adopted two different explicit power judgment tasks, one visual and one verbal. In the visual task, all verbal cues were ruled out, and in the verbal task, all visual cues were ruled out. Each task was coupled with a secondary task-either visuospatial or verbal-spatial-to investigate the underlying activation mechanism. The results showed that both coding systems were sufficient to generate such associations separately. Most importantly, the activation of two different codes was context-dependent and interfered by the related secondary tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41342968What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.