Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41342915›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Minimally invasive liver resection-New techniques].

Moritz Schmelzle, Cornelius Jakob van Beekum, Felix Gronau, Simon Störzer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moritz SchmelzleKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Cornelius Jakob van BeekumKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Felix GronauKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. Gronau.Felix@mh-hannover.de.
Simon StörzerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive procedures have been slowly gaining ground in liver surgery since the 1990s but have recently become increasingly more established. In Germany they are now used in around a quarter of all resections for colorectal metastases and much more often in specialized centers. In addition to less blood loss, the advantages include faster postoperative recovery with a correspondingly shorter hospital stay and all this with an oncological safety comparable to open procedures. Robotics provide additional advantages over laparoscopy, especially in complex resections such as posterosuperior segments or vascular and biliary reconstruction. At the same time, artificial intelligence, 3D reconstructions and augmented reality are becoming increasingly more important for planning, navigation and intraoperative safety. Robotics in particular will serve as a technical platform for the increasing digitalization and integration of modern imaging. Despite these advances, open surgery will remain the standard for selected highly complex procedures in the near future.

Indexed as

HepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresColorectal NeoplasmsHumansLaparoscopy3D reconstructionArtificial intelligenceAugmented realityColorectal metastasesRobotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.