ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
Computational Framework for Modeling Effects of Brain Collateral Circulation.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational Framework for Modeling Effects of Brain Collateral Circulation.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During a large vessel occlusion, the survivability of the affected brain tissue depends on the ability of blood to reach the compromised territory. Consequently, the severity of ischemic strokes and the outcome of interventional treatments like thrombectomy are strongly influenced by individual anatomical features of the brain's vascular network, particularly its collateralization. However, analyzing the role of collateral circulation has proven particularly challenging, as it requires highly detailed models of arterial networks that include very small collateral vessels (~50 μm diameter). This article presents a computational framework for constructing realistic brain vascular models that capture the anatomical variability of both the circle of Willis and the pial collateral network. The methodology integrates image-based vascular reconstruction, arterial tree extension via constrained constructive optimization, and generation of leptomeningeal collateral vessels. Blood flow simulations are performed using lumped parameter models, while virtual angiograms are generated through distributed compartment modeling of transport. A virtual patient population with variable collateralization is used to study the impact of anatomical differences on collateral flow and angiographic signatures in the presence of large vessel occlusions. The results show good agreement with in vivo data and highlight features that could help infer the level of collateralization from clinical angiograms. This framework offers a foundation for improving patient-specific stroke treatment planning and understanding the hemodynamic implications of vascular variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.