ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
A Decade of the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention's Epidemiologic and Economic Modeling Agreement.
Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) expanded capacity to conduct infectious disease and economic modeling through the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Epidemiologic and Economic Modeling Agreement (NEEMA). NEEMA brought together CDC scientists, academic partners, and public health practitioners at state and local levels to use epidemiologic and economic modeling to support the understanding of the efficiency, outcomes, cost-effectiveness, return on investment, and impact of programs and policies related to the center's disease foci, priority populations, and settings. In collaboration with state and local health departments, NEEMA activities included the development of tools to aid forecasting and decision-making. This article summarizes the scientific contributions and lessons learned from the NEEMA collaboration. During 2014-2024, NEEMA produced 136 peer-reviewed studies and 8 decision support tools. These studies have been cited 2697 times in peer-reviewed literature and referenced more than 70 times in policy documents. NEEMA has expanded the knowledge base on effective and cost-effective high-impact interventions for HIV, viral hepatitis, STD, and tuberculosis programs and continues to be responsive to changing needs for evidence to inform decision-making and policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.