Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41342814›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2026

Real-Time IVUS Guided (RTIG) Ostial Stenting: A Step-by-Step Guide.

Sarah L Fairley, Matthew Hordern, Muhammad Arshad, Bernard Wong, Cuneyt Ada, Bharat Khialani, Scott A Harding

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah L FairleyCardiology Department, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand. Electronic address: Sarah.Fairley@ccdhb.org.nz.
Matthew HordernCardiology Department, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Muhammad ArshadCardiology Department, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
Bernard WongCardiology Department, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cuneyt AdaCardiology Department, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Bharat KhialaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Scott A HardingCardiology Department, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOstial coronary lesions can be challenging to manage and have higher rates of target lesion failure. We describe the novel technique of real-time intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stenting to optimize ostial stent placement. KEY STEPS: The key steps are: 1) Wire the target vessel and side branch, and prepare the lesion based on IVUS appearances. 2) Deliver the stent in beyond the target vessel lesion. 3) Pass the IVUS catheter into the side branch. 4) Withdraw the stent to a near-ostial position angiographically. 5) Withdraw the IVUS transducer to where the ostium is visible. 6) Deploy the stent. 7) Withdraw the IVUS catheter first. 8) Postdilate the stent. 9) Take a final IVUS run and angiogram. POTENTIAL PITFALLS: The technique requires at least a 7-F guide catheter and a 5-F IVUS catheter. The main learning curve is understanding the IVUS appearances of the stent delivery system. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Real-time IVUS guidance is an effective and teachable technique to allow accurate placement of ostial side branch stents.

Indexed as

bifurcation lesionsintravascular ultrasoundostial stentingpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID41342814
PMCPMC12905681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.