ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026
Prioritizing quality of geriatric rehabilitation from the older adults' perspective: A nominal group technique study.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo identify and prioritize aspects of quality in geriatric rehabilitation from the perspective of older adults.DesignQualitative study using a structured Nominal Group Technique.SettingThree nominal group technique sessions were conducted in geriatric rehabilitation settings in the Netherlands.ParticipantsWe included older adults admitted to geriatric rehabilitation, Dutch proficiency, the ability to communicate and engage in group discussions, and an intention to return to independent living.InterventionParticipants engaged in structured nominal group technique sessions. Each session included five steps: introduction, idea generation, exchange of ideas, discussion, and ordering and rankingMain measuresAudio-recorded sessions were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a combined inductive and deductive coding. Quality aspects were prioritized based on their summed ranking scores, relative importance, and selection frequency.ResultsEighteen older adults were included. Participants identified five key priorities for quality in geriatric rehabilitation: (1) good preparation with clear expectations, (2) well-organized therapy and care, (3) relationships with healthcare professionals that acknowledge individual needs, (4) clear, respectful communication, and (5) autonomy in treatment decision-making. The qualitative analysis supported these priorities with three overarching themes: the value of a supportive environment, feeling heard and understood, and the need for guidance and involvement.ConclusionThis study provides priorities for improving quality in geriatric rehabilitation, according to the experiences of older adults and offers direction for implementation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.