ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Dual-Level Pattern Tree for Visual Field Improves Glaucoma Progression and Polygenic Risk Prediction.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a dual-level pattern tree to characterize visual field (VF) loss subtypes that can be used to better predict glaucoma progression and glaucoma polygenic risk scores (PRSs). Methods: This study included 113,030 patients from three datasets, each used for a specific purpose: (1) model training, (2) progression forecasting, and (3) PRS correlations. We applied archetypal analysis to cluster 24-2 VFs into trunk patterns and their branch patterns. The Cox regression model was used to forecast VF progression using mean deviation (MD) slope, MD-fast slope, total deviation (TD) pointwise slope, and visual field index (VFI) slope. Multivariable regression analyses were used to link VF patterns with glaucoma PRSs. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used for model comparisons. Results: We identified 17 trunk patterns and 169 branch patterns, with a mean of 9.9 ± 1.6 branches per trunk. Trunk-branch (T-B) patterns were consistently superior to trunk patterns (all contrast P < 0.05) for forecasting 5-year progression using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: MD, 0.60 vs. 0.58; MD-fast, 0.84 vs. 0.78; TD pointwise, 0.68 vs. 0.65; and VFI, 0.64 vs. 0.63. The trunk-branch patterns were superior in predicting PRSs (linear regression showed AIC improvement of 26). Conclusions: Trunk-branch VF classifiers were superior to trunk-only characterizations for predicting functional progression and glaucoma PRS. Translational Relevance: High-quality clustering of patient VF characteristics may allow physicians to better manage glaucoma patients by aligning with their goal of care and provide researchers with insights into glaucoma subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.