Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2025
Effect of Lutein Ester Supplement on Choroidal Thickness in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioactive Properties of Carotenoids in Ocular Diseases: Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Neuroprotective Effects.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Non-Pharmacological and Non-Optical Interventions for Myopia Prevention and Control in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Associations Between Carotenoid Status, Visual Outcomes and Cognitive Metrics in Children: A Scoping Review.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Variations in Macular Pigment Optical Density in Children and Adolescents Depending on Time Spent on Smartphones.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Repeated low-intensity red light combined with defocus-incorporated multiple segments (DIMS) spectacles for controlling myopia progression in children.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the effect of a six-month lutein ester supplementation on children's choroidal thickness (CT). Methods: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial recruited 180 children aged eight to twelve years in a school from April to May 2021. The follow-up was completed in November 2021. Participants were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 90, one sachet with 8 mg lutein ester) or the control group (n = 90, one placebo sachet). Each participant consumed one sachet daily orally for six months. Primary outcomes were between-group differences in changes in CT at six-month follow-up visits. Results: The six-month mean subfoveal CT decrease was 1.16 (-3.32 to 5.63) µm for the treatment group and -8.92 (-13.43 to -4.41) µm for the control group, with a mean difference of 10.08 µm (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.68 to 16.47, P = 0.002, corrected P = 0.018). The six-month mean temporal 1 mm and temporal 1.5 mm CTs decrease were -2.83 (-9.63 to 3.96) µm and -1.24 (-9.64 to 7.15) µm for the treatment group and -16.76 (-24.20 to -9.33) µm and -15.77 (-22.67 to -8.88) µm for the control group, with mean differences of 13.93 µm (95% CI, 3.79-24.07, P = 0.007, corrected P = 0.030) and 14.53 µm (95% CI, 3.59-25.47, P = 0.010, corrected P = 0.030), respectively. The two groups were not significantly different in the other grids (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Six-month lutein ester supplementation could effectively mitigate subfoveal and temporal choroidal thinning. Translational Relevance: Given lutein's favorable safety, affordability, and global availability, our study highlights its untapped potential as a promising, adjunctive nutritional strategy to support clinical efforts in myopia prevention and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.