ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
AI-Assisted Optical Coherence Tomography Segmentation for Enhanced Diagnosis of Inherited Retinal Diseases.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are rare and diverse, posing a diagnostic challenge in ophthalmology. This study aimed to determine whether artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image processing can improve IRD diagnosis and provide insights into disease characteristics. We used an optical coherence tomography (OCT) segmentation algorithm to characterize retinal features in IRDs. Two control groups were included to enhance the contextual understanding of these features: healthy eyes and eyes with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). An AI-driven classification model was then used to classify the data into disease and control groups. Methods: We analyzed 327 images from 181 patients with IRD and 146 control individuals, including healthy subjects and patients with AMD. IRD cases were stratified into macular and retinal dystrophies. Automated segmentation of six retinal layers and detection of nine biomarkers were performed on retinal OCT images using the AI-based RetinAI Discovery tool. A random forest classifier differentiated macular IRD, retinal IRD, and controls. Results: The model detected IRD with 91% accuracy and achieved 91% accuracy in differentiating macular from retinal IRD. Key OCT features for differentiation included reduced perifoveal photoreceptor and outer nuclear layer thicknesses and increased retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in retinal IRD. Macular IRD featured significant foveal photoreceptor and outer nuclear layer thinning. Conclusions: This study shows that standardized OCT image analysis combined with AI-based classification can accurately detect and stratify IRDs. The model's high accuracy highlights its potential as a reliable diagnostic tool in ophthalmology. Translational Relevance: This AI-assisted OCT evaluation approach enhances ophthalmic diagnostics by improving IRD detection and classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.