ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2026
The Differential Effects of Fast Walking Speed on Muscle Coactivation in the Paretic and Non-Paretic Extremities Post-Stroke.
Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical practice guidelines for walking recovery post-stroke recommend high aerobic intensity training, which usually involves walking at fast speeds. However, the acute effect of fast speeds on the neuromuscular control of walking is unclear.
objectives(1) Assess the criterion validity of the Dynamic Motor Control Index (WalkDMC) as a measure of coactivation post-stroke. (2) Assess acute speed-dependent coactivation post-stroke. (3) Assess how clinical characteristics shape the speed-dependent coactivation response. (4) Assess the relationship between heart rate and coactivation post-stroke. We hypothesized that WalkDMC is correlated with function and impairment measures. We also hypothesize that coactivation measured via the WalkDMC increases for speeds above or below self-selected speeds (SSS).
methods32 chronic stroke survivors and 17 age and sex-matched controls walked at SSS, fast, and slow speeds. EMGs were measured bilaterally on 7 lower extremity muscles. We used non-negative matrix factorization to calculate WalkDMC. We used regression to assess the relationship between WalkDMC, speed, heart rate, and clinical outcomes.
resultsWalkDMC was correlated with clinical outcomes, supporting its criterion validity. We observed a quadratic relationship between speed and coactivation: for the paretic extremity, the predicted speed that would lead to the lowest coactivation was ~120% higher than SSS. Slow speeds consistently increased coactivation in controls and participants post-stroke. Coactivation in the paretic extremity was significantly predicted by speed, balance, and impairment.
conclusionsOur results suggest that increased speeds lead to differential improvements in coactivation in the paretic and non-paretic extremities. These results may inform speed prescriptions for HIT interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.