ArticleWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2025
Community Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Lessons Learned for Long-Term Outcomes.
Article in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Technologies in Cardiac Rehabilitation for High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients: A Narrative Review of Mobile Health, Virtual Reality, Exergaming and Virtual Education.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Community Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Lessons Learned for Long-Term Outcomes.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough some research supports the maintenance of positive outcomes from cardiac rehabilitation Phase II (CR II) up to 12 months, the barriers to maintaining physical activity and risk factor management during CR maintenance (CR III) are well known.
aimTo investigate participants' ability to sustain clinical, quality-of-life (QOL), and behavioral outcomes and share their experiences 6 months after CR II completion.
methodsLongitudinal explanatory sequential pre-CR/post-CR study in a community hospital within a large health system. A convenience sample of 155 participants completed a reassessment of health outcomes. Participants also completed an online survey about barriers and facilitators during and after CR II. Analysis methods included MANOVA and summative content analysis.
resultsThe sample was mostly male, white, non-Hispanic, and college educated, with a mean age of 67.9 years. CR II participants sustained most behavioral outcomes, but not all clinical outcomes. Outcomes that improved/maintained were physical activity, tobacco status, diet, and QOL. Outcomes that worsened/returned to pre-CR II were weight, blood pressure, and depression. Participants described their motivation for staying healthy, top concerns, goals, barriers, and strengths/resources. Common responses included exercise, weight, diet, quality of life, family, and friends. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Our findings suggest the need for the implementation of innovative strategies during CR II that may extend past discharge into CR III. These include the introduction of digital technology and eHealth to provide value-added service to patients and a solid foundation for future maintenance and a structured, behavioral weight loss intervention. Establishing these tools, in addition to developing a support system will help patients to initiate maintenance care before program completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.