ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2025
The Hidden Trigger of Migraine: The Role of Intranasal Mucosal Contact Points.
Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intranasal mucosal contact points (MCPs) can exacerbate primary headaches or give rise to secondary headaches. In this study, the prevalence of intranasal MCPs and their relationship with migraine features were investigated in patients diagnosed with episodic migraine. Methods: Fifty migraineurs were enrolled in the migraine group, and 50 without migraine in the control group in this retrospective study. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and Headache Impact Scale (HIT-6) scores were retrieved from the patient files. Coronal and axial computed tomography sections were scanned, and intranasal MCP and anatomical variations within these were recorded. The prevalence of MCP was then compared across the 2 groups. Results: The patient group had a considerably higher prevalence of MCP than the control group (P=.018). No meaningful correlations were detected between mucosal contact and age, sex, migraine aura, menstruation, frequency of migraine attacks, duration of attacks, pain severity (VAS), or the effect of migraine on daily living (MIDAS) and quality of life (HIT-6). Conclusion: The findings indicate that an increased prevalence of migraine is associated with intranasal mucosal contact, which occurs particularly between the middle concha and septum. Further clinical studies researching the role of intranasal mucosal contact in migraine are now needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.