ArticleThe Veterinary record2026
A structured, behavioural science approach to the preparation of antimicrobial stewardship interventions for companion animal veterinarians.
Article in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA structured, behavioural science approach was adopted to develop antimicrobial stewardship interventions in UK first-opinion companion animal veterinary practice. The objectives were to identify behavioural targets for intervention and to understand how practice contexts influence these behaviours.
methodsBehavioural targets were selected by expert collaborators from a longlist prepared by the lead author. Five veterinary practices were recruited through opportunistic sampling. The lead author shadowed 17 consulting veterinarians, recording observations and informal interviews. Common themes were identified through a combined deductive and inductive approach to describe barriers to and enablers of the behavioural targets.
resultsThe behavioural targets were that veterinarians should: (1) document why they prescribed the highest-priority antimicrobials, (2) perform cytology, (3) prescribe alternative pharmaceutical interventions, and (4) provide advice and reassurance. Important barriers were that veterinarians were unfamiliar with less critically important antimicrobials for cats and non-prescription topical chlorhexidine products. LIMITATIONS: A single researcher was responsible for constructing the longlist of behavioural targets, visiting practices, collecting data, and coding observations and quotations. The behavioural targets were complex and data saturation was unlikely to have been achieved.
conclusionsChoosing and exploring behavioural targets in a structured manner identified clear and specific targets for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.