ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2025
Prescription of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide for the Prophylaxis of Migraine in Austria: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Analysis of Nationwide Insurance Data.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prescriber adherence to treatment guidelines for monoclonal antibodies against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide in migraine prophylaxis - a register-based cohort study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Prescription of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide for the Prophylaxis of Migraine in Austria: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Analysis of Nationwide Insurance Data.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInsurance data allow insights into dispensations of medications. This retrospective study over 49 months examined dispensations of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP-mAbs).
methodsUsing nationwide insurance data, we examined dispensations of erenumab, fremanezumab, or galcanezumab from September 1, 2018 to September 30, 2022. We examined the duration of treatment and breaks (Kaplan-Meier curves, medians, quartiles), persistence (proportion of days covered), and switches, acute medications, and other preventatives.
resultsOf 8.8 million persons, 8934 were at least once dispensed a CGRP-mAb (83.5% women, median age 45 years). Median individual follow-up time was 710 days, median duration of treatment with any CGRP-mAb was 297 days, 42.9% had CGRP-mAbs for at least 1 year. Median duration of treatment with the first-ever CGRP-mAb was 327 days; 63.4% experienced a therapy break. Within 1 year after stopping, 53.5% resumed the same CGRP-mAb, 16.9% another CGRP-mAb, 29.6% did not resume any CGRP-mAb; 13.7% started a second CGRP-mAb and 1.7% a third. 22% definitively stopped therapy within their follow-up. Dispensation of triptans decreased during and after therapy with CGRP-mAbs; dispensation of other acute prescription medications was low without change. 11.4% had other preventatives before and 2.4% during CGRP-mAb therapy. The proportion of days covered was 96%.
conclusionsIn this nationwide study persistence with CGRP-mAbs was excellent; dispensations of triptans and other preventatives decreased during CGRP-mAb therapy. Therapy breaks were common, but the majority resumed CGRP-mAbs, which indicates the need for long-term prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.