Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41342056›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of school health2026

Universal School Meal Policies and Perceived Stigma: Quantitative Evidence From Eight US States.

Dania Orta-Aleman, Monica D Zuercher, Leah E Chapman, Marlene B Schwartz, Caitlin D French, Anisha I Patel, Lorrene Ritchie, Juliana Cohen, Wendi Gosliner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dania Orta-AlemanNutrition Policy Institute, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-8714
Monica D ZuercherNutrition Policy Institute, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2758-9807
Leah E ChapmanDepartment of Nutrition & Public Health, Merrimack College, North Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
Marlene B SchwartzDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, Rudd Center for Food Policy and Health, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8939-1954
Caitlin D FrenchNutrition Policy Institute, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California, USA.
Anisha I PatelDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Lorrene RitchieNutrition Policy Institute, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8038-1821
Juliana CohenDepartment of Nutrition & Public Health, School of Nursing and Health Science, Merrimack College, North Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
Wendi GoslinerNutrition Policy Institute, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California, USA.

Funding

California General Fund SB170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal school meals (USMs) policies, which provide free meals to all students regardless of income, have the potential to improve child nutrition and reduce stigma. Quantitative evidence on the association between USM and stigma is limited.

methodsLeveraging a natural policy variation in state-level USM implementation, we surveyed 1066 middle and high school students from eight US states (four with USM, four without) during the 2022-2023 school year. Stigma was measured as self-reported embarrassment about eating school lunch. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the associations between USM, embarrassment, and lunch participation.

resultsOverall about one in nine students (11.5%) across all surveyed states reported embarrassment, which was associated with 11% less frequent (aRR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.97). School lunch participation overall, especially among those from low-income families. While USM was associated with lower odds of embarrassment among students from low-income families, higher-income students in USM states were more likely to feel embarrassed. IMPLICATIONS: Addressing stigma requires pairing USM with strategies to enhance meal quality, cultural relevance, and inclusive messaging.

conclusionsUSM can alleviate stigma for lower-income students yet may increase embarrassment among higher-income peers, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches benefiting all socioeconomic groups.

Indexed as

Food ServicesNutrition PolicySchoolsSocial StigmaStudentsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLunchMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesadolescent healthfood securitypolicyschool nutritionstigmauniversal school meals

Identifiers

PMID41342056
PMCPMC12676369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.