ArticleData in brief2025
Image dataset of ten durian diseases captured in real-field conditions from a family orchard in Vinh Long, Vietnam.
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This dataset comprises 5452 images of durian plant parts-including leaves, flowers, branches, stems, and roots-affected by ten common disease classes. The images were captured from one family-owned durian orchard and four nearby orchards in Vinh Long Province, Vietnam. Each class contains approximately 405-427 raw images, photographed using an iPhone 14 under natural field conditions. These conditions simulate typical farmer photography practices, featuring varied angles, inconsistent lighting, and complex environmental backgrounds, resulting in significant visual noise. All raw JPEG images were manually reviewed and cropped on macOS systems using MacBook devices equipped with Apple M4 chips to focus on disease-affected regions, reduce file size, and minimize background noise. The processed, cropped images are provided in PNG format with variable dimensions. Images were resized to 224×224 pixels only during model training for machine learning experiments. Disease symptoms were verified in collaboration with plant pathologists to ensure accurate classification. This dataset is publicly available on Mendeley Data and is suitable for developing and evaluating machine learning models in plant disease classification. It is particularly valuable for testing model performance under real-world, noisy conditions and for supporting the creation of mobile or edge-based diagnostic tools in agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.