Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341988›Full record

ArticleJMIR neurotechnology2023

Application of a Low-Cost mHealth Solution for the Remote Monitoring of Patients With Epilepsy: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Natarajan Sriraam, S Raghu, Erik D Gommer, Danny M W Hilkman, Yasin Temel, Shyam Vasudeva Rao, Alangar Satyaranjandas Hegde, Pieter L Kubben

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR neurotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natarajan SriraamCenter for Medical Electronics and Computing Ramaiah Institute of Technology Bengaluru India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3790-3900
S RaghuCenter for Medical Electronics and Computing Ramaiah Institute of Technology Bengaluru India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-6751
Erik D GommerDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-2682
Danny M W HilkmanDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7687-9037
Yasin TemelDepartment of Neurosurgery Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3589-5604
Shyam Vasudeva RaoDepartment of Neurosurgery Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8852-8531
Alangar Satyaranjandas HegdeInstitute of Neuroscience Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals Bengaluru India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3315-9563
Pieter L KubbenDepartment of Neurosurgery Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8059-523X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implementing automated seizure detection in long-term electroencephalography (EEG) analysis enables the remote monitoring of patients with epilepsy, thereby improving their quality of life. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore an mHealth (mobile health) solution by investigating the feasibility of smartphones for processing large EEG recordings for the remote monitoring of patients with epilepsy. Methods: We developed a mobile app to automatically analyze and classify epileptic seizures using EEG. We used the cross-database model developed in our previous study, incorporating successive decomposition index and matrix determinant as features, adaptive median feature baseline correction for overcoming interdatabase feature variation, and postprocessing-based support vector machine for classification using 5 different EEG databases. The Sezect (Seizure Detect) Android app was built using the Chaquopy software development kit, which uses the Python language in Android Studio. Various durations of EEG signals were tested on different smartphones to check the feasibility of the Sezect app. Results: We observed a sensitivity of 93.5%, a specificity of 97.5%, and a false detection rate of 1.5 per hour for EEG recordings using the Sezect app. The various mobile phones did not differ substantially in processing time, which indicates a range of phone models can be used for implementation. The computational time required to process real-time EEG data via smartphones and the classification results suggests that our mHealth app could be a valuable asset for monitoring patients with epilepsy. Conclusions: Smartphones have multipurpose use in health care, offering tools that can improve the quality of patients' lives.

Indexed as

AndroidbrainclassificationdetectdetectiondiagnosediagnosisdiagnosticEEGelectroencephalogramelectroencephalographyepilepsyepilepticepileptic seizuresimagingmHealthmobile healthmobile phonemobile phone–based epilepsy monitoringmonitoringneurologicalneurologyneuroscienceseizuresmartphonesmartphonessupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID41341988
PMCPMC12671322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.