ReviewActa gastroenterologica Latinoamericana
[Impact of P-CABs in the Treatment of Acid-related Diseases: an Evidence Review].
Review in Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Potassium competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), such as vonoprazan, fexuprazan, tegoprazan and revaprazan are an innovative class of drugs designed to treat conditions related to gastric acid secretion, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection and peptic ulcer disease. These drugs work by reversibly and competitively inhibiting the H+/K+-ATPase proton pump, which allows them to suppress gastric acid production more effectively and faster than traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In addition, these drugs are not affected by the CYP2C19 enzyme and their effect is independent of food intake, giving them advantages over most PPIs. Clinical studies have shown that P-CABs are superior to PPIs in the treating of severe erosive GERD and non-inferior in mild and non-erosive disease. In addition, P-CABs offer non-inferior and in some cases superior Hp eradication rates to PPIs in first-line treatment, but not in second-line treatment. In conclusion, P-CABs are emerging as promising alternatives in the treatment of acid-dependent gastrointestinal disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.