ArticleJPRAS open2025
Stemness and clinical performance of water-jet technology: A translational study in breast reconstruction.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous fat grafting has become integral to breast reconstruction, yet variability in graft retention continues to challenge its reliability. This study aimed to characterize the biological and clinical properties of adipose tissue harvested using Body-Jet water-assisted liposuction (WAL) technology. A cohort of 171 patients undergoing 206 lipofilling procedures was analyzed, alongside in vitro studies evaluating adipose-derived cell viability, proliferative capacity, and molecular profile. Lipoaspirates obtained using Body-Jet demonstrated high cellular viability, robust mesenchymal stem cell proliferation (doubling time ∼15 hours), and consistent trilineage differentiation (adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic). Gene expression and secretome analyses revealed a regenerative molecular signature, including balanced cytokine, growth factor, and extracellular matrix protein profiles. Clinically, the WAL approach was associated with low postoperative pain (mean NRS 3.17), minimal complications, and high patient satisfaction, as assessed using BREAST-Q outcomes. A significant correlation emerged between BMI and harvested fat volume, with no association between pain and BMI or donor site. These findings support the hypothesis that Body-Jet-based liposuction yields biologically viable and regenerative lipoaspirates, while offering favorable clinical tolerability. Although transient side effects such as edema and bruising were observed, the overall safety and quality of harvested tissue support the further use of WAL in fat grafting. Prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm long-term outcomes and comparative efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.