ArticleJPRAS open2025
Reconstruction after wide excision of the nail apparatus for in situ or minimally invasive subungual melanoma: A retrospective case series.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Historically, subungual melanoma (SUM) was treated by amputation of the affected digit. Wide local excision (WLE) of the nail apparatus has since become a conservative alternative for in situ or minimally invasive lesions. While several reconstructive techniques have been described after WLE, few centers have reported their outcomes objectively. This study presents our series of reconstructions following WLE of the nail apparatus. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at a university hospital, including patients referred by dermatologists for WLE and nail apparatus reconstruction between 2021 and 2024. Clinical, surgical, functional, and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using validated scores (QuickDASH, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, AOFAS). Results: Ten patients were included. Reconstructions were performed with full-thickness skin grafts ( Conclusion: Nail apparatus reconstruction is feasible for in situ or minimally invasive SUM, particularly when the Breslow thickness is ≤0.5 mm. In invasive cases, immediate reconstruction risks being performed over residual tumor, supporting a two-stage approach, especially when donor site morbidity is expected. Techniques such as full-thickness skin grafts combined with a dermal matrix provide reliable functional and aesthetic outcomes. A two-stage approach is particularly valuable when oncologic margins are uncertain, as it reduces the risk of reconstructing over residual disease while preserving options with lower donor-site morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.