ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Qualitative Factors Impacting Patients and Clinicians Regarding Intravitreal Injections for Retinal Disorders: A Scoping Review.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health, hope and worry: A qualitative study of people with diabetes' experiences with anti-VEGF treatment.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravitreal injections are among the most frequently performed eye procedures worldwide. They are vital in managing vision-related retinal conditions such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema and retinal vein occlusion. This review scopes qualitative research concerning people's beliefs, perspectives, experiences and behaviors towards intravitreal injections. Methods: Academic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science) were searched for studies focused on qualitative research of intravitreal injections in adult patients, published between January 2000 and May 2024. We extracted data regarding publication and participants' characteristics, main study objectives, and methodological approaches. Results: Of the 795 identified citations, 28 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported on patients' emotional experiences of undergoing intravitreal injections, with the fear of vision loss compounded with ongoing injections prompting significant anxiety and uncertainty for patients. Other studies also reported on the physical component as the invasiveness of the procedure caused pain and discomfort, which varied with the clinician's delivery of the injection. One study reported on clinician experiences of performing intravitreal injections, stating that the treatment decisions are dependent on patient-related factors such as their adherence to regular injections. Overall, qualitative research in ophthalmology is increasing, with most studies employing semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis. Conclusion: Qualitative research offers valuable insights into both patient and clinician experiences of intravitreal injections, which can shape person-centered and sustainable models of intravitreal treatment. Understanding qualitative factors such as personal experiences and barriers to treatment can refine the delivery of intravitreal injections and ultimately improve patient adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.