Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341942›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Predictive factors for vaginal delivery in pregnant women with previous cesarean section: a case-control study.

Gabriela Sabbatine Reis, Lucas Casagrande Passoni Lopes, Eleksandra Cibele Gusman Vendramini, Ênio Luis Damaso, Vera Therezinha Medeiros Borges

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriela Sabbatine ReisUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu BotucatuSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7308-5214
Lucas Casagrande Passoni LopesUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Bauru BauruSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3205-7249
Eleksandra Cibele Gusman VendraminiUniversidade de São Paulo Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais BauruSP Brazil Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2081-9750
Ênio Luis DamasoUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Bauru BauruSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0498-1411
Vera Therezinha Medeiros BorgesUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu BotucatuSP Brazil Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-9641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors that predict the likelihood of a successful vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). Methods: An observational, case-control study was conducted at Hospital das Clínicas, Botucatu Medical School, a tertiary referral center in Brazil. Medical records of women with singleton term pregnancies, one previous cesarean section, and a live fetus in cephalic presentation who delivered between January 2013 and December 2015 were reviewed. Participants were classified according to delivery mode: vaginal birth after cesarean section or repeat cesarean section. Maternal demographics, clinical and obstetric characteristics, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Associations were assessed using chi-square, and significant variables were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: A total of 653 women met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 324(49.6%) achieved a vaginal birth, and 329(50.4%) underwent a repeat cesarean section. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of vaginal birth included a history of prior vaginal delivery, cervical dilation of at least 4 cm at admission, a Bishop score of 6 or higher, spontaneous onset of labor, absence of chronic hypertension, and neonates classified as appropriate or small for gestational age. In contrast, advanced maternal age, unemployment, diabetes, and hypertensive disorders were associated with an increased likelihood of cesarean delivery. Conclusion: VBAC was more likely in women with cervical dilation of 4 cm or more at admission, a Bishop score of 6 or higher, a history of vaginal birth, spontaneous labor onset, absence of chronic hypertension, and lower neonatal birth weight.

Indexed as

Vaginal Birth after CesareanAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRisk FactorsYoung AdultCesarean sectionPredictive factorsPregnancyVaginal birthVaginal birth after cesarean

Identifiers

PMID41341942
PMCPMC12671674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.