Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025
Predictive factors for vaginal delivery in pregnant women with previous cesarean section: a case-control study.
Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify factors that predict the likelihood of a successful vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC). Methods: An observational, case-control study was conducted at Hospital das Clínicas, Botucatu Medical School, a tertiary referral center in Brazil. Medical records of women with singleton term pregnancies, one previous cesarean section, and a live fetus in cephalic presentation who delivered between January 2013 and December 2015 were reviewed. Participants were classified according to delivery mode: vaginal birth after cesarean section or repeat cesarean section. Maternal demographics, clinical and obstetric characteristics, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Associations were assessed using chi-square, and significant variables were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: A total of 653 women met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 324(49.6%) achieved a vaginal birth, and 329(50.4%) underwent a repeat cesarean section. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of vaginal birth included a history of prior vaginal delivery, cervical dilation of at least 4 cm at admission, a Bishop score of 6 or higher, spontaneous onset of labor, absence of chronic hypertension, and neonates classified as appropriate or small for gestational age. In contrast, advanced maternal age, unemployment, diabetes, and hypertensive disorders were associated with an increased likelihood of cesarean delivery. Conclusion: VBAC was more likely in women with cervical dilation of 4 cm or more at admission, a Bishop score of 6 or higher, a history of vaginal birth, spontaneous labor onset, absence of chronic hypertension, and lower neonatal birth weight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.