Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341938›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Blood pressure reactivity to mental stress is related to daily blood pressure variability in postmenopausal hypertensive women.

Ana Clara Ribeiro Cunha, Caroline Pereira Garcês, Tássia Magnabosco Sisconeto, Juliene Gonçalves Costa, Mateus de Lima Rodrigues, Igor Moraes Mariano, Ana Luiza Amaral, Guilherme Morais Puga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Clara Ribeiro CunhaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de Educação Física UberlândiaMG Brazil Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-2147
Caroline Pereira GarcêsUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de Educação Física UberlândiaMG Brazil Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4246-3594
Tássia Magnabosco SisconetoUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de Educação Física UberlândiaMG Brazil Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-5524
Juliene Gonçalves CostaUniversity of Western Australia School of Human Sciences Perth Australia School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4452-3255
Mateus de Lima RodriguesUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de Engenharia Elétrica UberlândiaMG Brazil Faculdade de Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4888-8876
Igor Moraes MarianoUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de Educação Física UberlândiaMG Brazil Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-8669
Ana Luiza AmaralUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de Educação Física UberlândiaMG Brazil Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5321-8041
Guilherme Morais PugaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia Faculdade de Educação Física UberlândiaMG Brazil Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-6640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between blood pressure (BP) responses during a mental stress test with 24-hour ambulatory BP (ABPM) and its variability (BPV) in postmenopausal hypertensive women. Methods: BP reactivity under mental stress and ABPM were evaluated in 75 postmenopausal hypertensive women between 50 and 70 years, on non-consecutive days. We used the values of the variation (∆) of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP from the reactivity test as independent variables, and the BPV indexes Average Real Variability (ARV), 24-hour SD, and SDdn (standard deviation weighted by daytime and nighttime duration) as dependent variables. In the multiple linear regression analysis, three models were tested: 1) without adjustment; 2) adjusted for time since menopause; and 3) adjusted for both nocturnal BP dipping classification and time since menopause. Results: The ARV index showed a significant association with ∆SBP variation in all models (model 1,2 and 3: β coefficient: 0.04, CI 95%: [0.00;0.08]). Conclusion: In conclusion, blood pressure variation during the mental stress test is related to ambulatory blood pressure variation, specifically to ARV in postmenopausal hypertensive women. These findings suggest that systolic blood pressure responses to mental stress may be a relevant predictor of daily blood pressure variability.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHypertensionPostmenopauseStress, PsychologicalAgedBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedambulatoryBlood pressureBlood pressure monitoringClimactericExercise testHypertensionLinear modelsPostmenopauseStroop test

Identifiers

PMID41341938
PMCPMC12671659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.