Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341934›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Subsequent mammography reduces recall and increases breast cancer detection: an audit of a screening program.

Erika Marina Solla Negrao, Mariana Alves Almeida, Emanuele Françoso Cardoso, Alvaro Silva Almeida, Samanta Santos Sousa, Cassio Cardoso-Filho, Rodrigo Menezes Jales, Diama Bhadra Vale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erika Marina Solla NegraoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Department of de Tocogynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of de Tocogynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8080-8787
Mariana Alves AlmeidaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Department of de Tocogynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of de Tocogynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3999-9420
Emanuele Françoso CardosoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Department of de Tocogynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of de Tocogynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-8717
Alvaro Silva AlmeidaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Department of de Tocogynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of de Tocogynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4086-4579
Samanta Santos SousaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Department of de Tocogynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of de Tocogynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9678-4208
Cassio Cardoso-FilhoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Department of de Tocogynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of de Tocogynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-0106
Rodrigo Menezes JalesUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Department of de Tocogynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of de Tocogynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8802-8870
Diama Bhadra ValeUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Department of de Tocogynecology CampinasSP Brazil Department of de Tocogynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-0225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyze recall rates in a public breast cancer screening facility in Campinas, Brazil. Methods: A prospective assessment of outcomes on screening mammographies (MMG) between July 2023 and August 2024. BI-RADS® 0,4/5 indicated positive results, and women recalled. The variables were age, whether first or subsequent MMG, and biopsy (cancer positive or negative). The outcomes were recall rate and cancer detection rate on the recall (CDR). Prevalence ratio with 95% confidence interval (PR) estimated the risk. Results: There were included 19,377 MMG on women over 40: 15,983 subsequent MMG (82.5%), and 1,646 women recalled (BR 0,4/5). Adherence to recall was over 99%. The recall rates were 12.4% at first and 7.7% at subsequent MMG. Recall rate was 1.6 times higher at first than at subsequent MMG (PR 1.61;1.45-1.79). CDR was higher at subsequent MMG. A first MMG reduced the risk of cancer detection by 71% (PR 0.29-0.15;0.58). Compared to women 50-69, there were no differences in the risks of recall and cancer detection at first MMG. At subsequent MMG the recall risk was higher in women 40-49 (PR 1.16;1.03-1.30), and over 69 (PR 1.47;1.03-2.12). The risk of cancer detection was 60% lower in women 40-49 (PR 0.60;0.36-0.99), and 2.7 times higher in women over 69 (PR 2.78;1.32-5.84). Conclusion: The recall rates were 12.4% at first and 7.7% at subsequent MMG. Adherence was high. Screening efficiency was higher in women 50-69. At subsequent screenings women 40-49 showed a higher recall rate and a lower CDR when compared to women 50-69.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyMass ScreeningAdultAgedBrazilFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBiopsyBreast densityBreast neoplasmsEarly detection of cancerMammographyPrevalenceQuality of health careScreening

Identifiers

PMID41341934
PMCPMC12671671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.