Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025
Analysis of the influence of advanced maternal age on gestational and fetal outcomes.
Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Advanced maternal age has become more common due to factors such as increased academic preparation for women, labor market participation, delayed family planning, and advances in reproductive medicine. This phenomenon raises questions about the risks and gestational outcomes associated with advanced maternal age (AMA). This study aims to explore the gestational and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with AMA (> 35 years), comparing them with those of women aged 20 to 34 years. Methods: The research was conducted as an observational and retrospective analysis, examining data from 2012 to 2022 from the Hospital Production System (SIH/SUS) available on the DATAsus platform, covering all regions of Brazil. Variables analyzed included gestational duration, type of pregnancy (single or multiple), mode of delivery, Robson group, APGAR score at five minutes, birth weight, and occurrence of congenital anomalies. Results: Pregnant women with AMA showed statistically significant differences in the higher percentage of cesarean sections (63.3% AMA vs 58% non-AMA, p<0.05), higher percentage of low birth weight newborns (12.5% AMA vs 6.7% non-AMA, p<0.05), lower APGAR scores at the fifth minute (OR = 1.08, p<0.001) and a higher prevalence of any congenital anomalies (1.23% AMA vs 0.77% non-AMA, OR =OR = 1.34, p < 0.001). In addition, this group had a higher incidence of premature births (12.99% AMA vs 8.78% non-AMA) and multiple pregnancies (1.39% AMA vs 0.83% non-AMA). Furthermore, in the Robson classification, there was a predominance of older mothers in Group 5 (previous cesarean section) and in the groups with nulliparity. Conclusion: Pregnant women with AMA face higher gestational and perinatal risks, such as preterm births and an increased need for cesarean sections. These findings underscore the importance of public policies and personalized management strategies to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes for older pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.