Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341931›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Incidence of aneuploidy in embryos studied using PGT-A in Mexico: a clinical retrospective experience.

Eduardo Ponce-Najera, Diana María Ojeda-López, Rodolfo González-Holveman, Ricardo Rodríguez-Calderon, Karla Patricia Bedia-Mejía, Jose Carlos Salazar-Trujillo, Jorge Luis Lezama-Ruvalcaba, Carlos Gerardo Salazar López-Ortiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eduardo Ponce-NajeraHospital Español de México Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP Mexico City Mexico Hospital Español de México, Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP, Mexico City.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-1942
Diana María Ojeda-LópezHospital Español de México Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP Mexico City Mexico Hospital Español de México, Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP, Mexico City.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7395-9780
Rodolfo González-HolvemanHospital Español de México Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP Mexico City Mexico Hospital Español de México, Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP, Mexico City.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7584-2402
Ricardo Rodríguez-CalderonHospital Español de México Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP Mexico City Mexico Hospital Español de México, Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP, Mexico City.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3888-8944
Karla Patricia Bedia-MejíaHospital Español de México Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP Mexico City Mexico Hospital Español de México, Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP, Mexico City.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0528-9637
Jose Carlos Salazar-TrujilloHospital Español de México Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP Mexico City Mexico Hospital Español de México, Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP, Mexico City.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1897-1089
Jorge Luis Lezama-RuvalcabaHospital Español de México Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP Mexico City Mexico Hospital Español de México, Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP, Mexico City.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9788-7400
Carlos Gerardo Salazar López-OrtizHospital Español de México Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP Mexico City Mexico Hospital Español de México, Assisted Reproduction Clinic HISPAREP, Mexico City.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-662X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the relationship between aneuploidy and maternal age based on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and the distribution of aneuploidy across individual chromosomes. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. The study included patients who underwent PGT-A during their in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle between 2016 and 2024. PGT-A was performed on 1,341 embryos from 481 patients using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based techniques. We conducted a Logistic regression analysis to determine the relationship between maternal age and the rate of aneuploidy; additionally, the most commonly affected chromosome and the characteristics of the detected alterations were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v17. Results: Among all patients, the observed aneuploidy rate was 55.85%. In patients younger than 30 years, the aneuploidy rate was 26.92%, with a progressive increase to 62% in women older than 40 years. Chromosomes 22, 21, 16, and 15 were the most frequently affected. Logistic regression indicated that age is a significant predictive factor for aneuploidy (coefficient = 0.0956; p < 0.001), with an odds ratio of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.07-1.13), meaning that the probability of aneuploidy increases by approximately 10% for each additional year of age. Conclusion: Our results indicate that an increase in maternal age is significantly associated with a higher incidence of aneuploidy in embryos that underwent PGT-A. These findings are significant for patient counseling and optimizing embryo selection in assisted reproduction treatments.

Indexed as

AneuploidyPreimplantation DiagnosisAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHumansIncidenceMaternal AgeMexicoPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAneuploidyFertilization in vitroGenetic testingHigh-throughput nucleotide sequencingMaternal agePGT-APreimplantation diagnosisReproduction

Identifiers

PMID41341931
PMCPMC12671660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.