ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025
Newborn clavicle fractures: 5 year-review of a tertiary-care hospital.
Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Clavicle fractures are the most common birth-related fractures. They may cause pain, arm mobility impairment, and brachial nerve injury (temporary or definitive). Therefore, we aimed to review the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of neonatal clavicle fractures in our hospital. Methods: All cases of clavicle fractures diagnosed and registered during the neonatal period between 2018 and 2022, in a tertiary-care Portuguese hospital, were reviewed. Statistical descriptive analysis, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals(95%CI) were calculated. Results: A total of 8132 births and 91 clavicle fractures were identified (1.1% incidence) - 0.04% (1/2512) in cesarean sections and 1.7% (90/5453) in vaginal births. An instrumental vaginal birth doubled the probability of clavicle fractures (OR 2.072, 95%CI 1.365-3.145 compared to spontaneous births). In 15.4% of clavicle fractures, births were complicated by shoulder dystocia. Shoulder dystocia significantly increased the risk of clavicle fracture (OR 35.71; 95% CI 17.86-71.43). Of the 91 cases, 22% resulted from pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes; in these cases, the risk of clavicle fractures increased 76% (OR 1.761, 95%CI 1.068-2.904). Most of the cases were referred to a Neonatology follow-up appointment (92.3%). Fifteen neonates had a clinical suspicion of brachial plexus injury, but all of them regained normal arm mobility after physiotherapy. Conclusion: The incidence of clavicle fractures in our hospital is comparable to the literature (1.1%). To reduce the incidence of clavicle fractures not only its risk factors must be reduced, but a simulation-based labor ward team training program on shoulder dystocia should also be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.