Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341927›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2025

Newborn clavicle fractures: 5 year-review of a tertiary-care hospital.

Joana Rita Pinto Galvão, Mariana da Silva Leal, Margarida Neves Maciel da Silva, Nuno Miguel Sanches de Almeida, Carla Isabel Pereira Faustino Ferreira, Inês Maria Moreira Guedes Maia Nunes de Melo Seco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joana Rita Pinto GalvãoUnidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-4040
Mariana da Silva LealUnidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0841-0197
Margarida Neves Maciel da SilvaUnidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6542-8022
Nuno Miguel Sanches de AlmeidaUnidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-1241
Carla Isabel Pereira Faustino FerreiraUnidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3981-3186
Inês Maria Moreira Guedes Maia Nunes de Melo SecoUnidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Vila Nova de Gaia Portugal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia e Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-3916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Clavicle fractures are the most common birth-related fractures. They may cause pain, arm mobility impairment, and brachial nerve injury (temporary or definitive). Therefore, we aimed to review the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of neonatal clavicle fractures in our hospital. Methods: All cases of clavicle fractures diagnosed and registered during the neonatal period between 2018 and 2022, in a tertiary-care Portuguese hospital, were reviewed. Statistical descriptive analysis, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals(95%CI) were calculated. Results: A total of 8132 births and 91 clavicle fractures were identified (1.1% incidence) - 0.04% (1/2512) in cesarean sections and 1.7% (90/5453) in vaginal births. An instrumental vaginal birth doubled the probability of clavicle fractures (OR 2.072, 95%CI 1.365-3.145 compared to spontaneous births). In 15.4% of clavicle fractures, births were complicated by shoulder dystocia. Shoulder dystocia significantly increased the risk of clavicle fracture (OR 35.71; 95% CI 17.86-71.43). Of the 91 cases, 22% resulted from pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes; in these cases, the risk of clavicle fractures increased 76% (OR 1.761, 95%CI 1.068-2.904). Most of the cases were referred to a Neonatology follow-up appointment (92.3%). Fifteen neonates had a clinical suspicion of brachial plexus injury, but all of them regained normal arm mobility after physiotherapy. Conclusion: The incidence of clavicle fractures in our hospital is comparable to the literature (1.1%). To reduce the incidence of clavicle fractures not only its risk factors must be reduced, but a simulation-based labor ward team training program on shoulder dystocia should also be implemented.

Indexed as

Birth InjuriesClavicleFractures, BoneFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMalePortugalPregnancyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTertiary Care CentersBirth injuriesClavicle/injuriesFractures, boneInfant, newborn

Identifiers

PMID41341927
PMCPMC12671675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.