Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341916›Full record

ArticleIntractable & rare diseases research2025

Challenges in Japan's dual systems of support for pediatric and adult intractable diseases.

Kenji Karako, Peipei Song

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Intractable & rare diseases research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenji KarakoDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Peipei SongCenter for Clinical Sciences, Japan institute for Health Security, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Japan has developed two separate frameworks to support patients with chronic and rare diseases: the Specified Pediatric Chronic Diseases (SPCD) Program and the Designated Intractable Diseases (DID) System. Although both aim to provide medical and social assistance, they differ in age of eligibility, diseases covered, and administrative procedures. The SPCD Program provides support to individuals under 18 years of age (extendable to 20) with 858 eligible conditions, whereas the DID System, with 348 designated diseases, applies to all ages. These structural discrepancies create a critical policy gap when pediatric patients transition into adulthood. Those whose conditions are not listed under the DID System lose their eligibility for public subsidies, resulting in sudden financial strain and reduced social participation. Additional issues include inconsistencies in diagnostic criteria, limited access to transitional care facilities -currently established in only 12 prefectures -and insufficient family-centered support, especially for siblings acting as young carers. To achieve continuity of care and equity, Japan must harmonize disease definitions and transition criteria, introduce temporary relief measures for non-designated patients, increase the number of Transitional Care Support Centers in regions, and institutionalize family-inclusive assistance. Establishing a seamless policy framework over a patient's life will not only encourage patients' independence but also strengthen the sustainability of Japan's healthcare system in the face of an aging population.

Indexed as

designated intractable diseasesfamily supportspecified pediatric chronic diseasessubsidy for medical expensestransitional care

Identifiers

PMID41341916
PMCPMC12672153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.