ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Early Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the early curative effect of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) in the treatment of adjacent segment disease after lumbar interbody fusion. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 58 patients diagnosed with adjacent segment disease subsequent to lumbar fusion surgery who were treated using the UBE technique between June 2019 and June 2024 at our institution was conducted. The patients' operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospitalization time, and the occurrence of complications were recorded. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) for lumbar function were utilised before and after surgery, and the MacNab criteria were employed to evaluate the patient's outcome at six months after surgery. Results: The operation time was between 55 and 189 minutes, mean 102.64 minutes, the postoperative drainage flow was between 10 and 110 mL mean 47.81 mL, and the length of hospital stay between 5 and 14 days, mean 9.41 days. VAS scores of pain decreased over time and the ODI index was consistently lower than preoperative at all stages of the postoperative period. JOA scores increased gradually at all postoperative times. All indexes differed statistically at all times (P<0.05). Surgical efficacy was excellent in 93.1% of cases at 6 months. Conclusion: The UBE technique is an alternative surgical procedure for the treatment of adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion, under strict control of the indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.