Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341870›Full record

ArticleJMIR XR and spatial computing2024

Exploring How Virtual Reality Could Be Used to Treat Eating Disorders: Qualitative Study of People With Eating Disorders and Clinicians Who Treat Them.

Helen Bould, Mari-Rose Kennedy, Ian Penton-Voak, Lisa May Thomas, Jon Bird, Lucy Biddle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR XR and spatial computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen BouldCentre for Academic Mental Health Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8163-3210
Mari-Rose KennedyNIHR Applied Research Collaboration West at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust Bristol United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4733-3518
Ian Penton-VoakNIHR Biomedical Research Centre University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4232-0953
Lisa May ThomasSchool for Policy Studies Centre for Sociodigital Futures University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6960-5740
Jon BirdDepartment of Computer Science University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1681-1532
Lucy BiddleCentre for Academic Mental Health Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-8771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immersive virtual reality (VR) interventions are being developed and trialed for use in the treatment of eating disorders. However, little work has explored the opinions of people with eating disorders, or the clinicians who treat them, on the possible use of VR in this context. Objective: This study aims to use qualitative methodology to explore the views of people with eating disorders, and clinicians who treat them, on the possible use of VR in the treatment of eating disorders. Methods: We conducted a series of focus groups and interviews with people with lived experience of eating disorders and clinicians on their views about VR and how it could potentially be used in the treatment of eating disorders. People with lived experience of eating disorders were recruited between October and December 2020, with focus groups held online between November 2020 and February 2021; clinicians were recruited in September 2021 and interviewed between September and October 2021. We took a thematic approach to analyzing the resulting qualitative data. Results: We conducted 3 focus groups with 10 individuals with a current or previous eating disorder, 2 focus groups with 4 participants, and 1 with 2 participants. We held individual interviews with 4 clinicians experienced in treating people with eating disorders. Clinicians were all interviewed one-to-one because of difficulties in scheduling mutually convenient groups. We describe themes around representing the body in VR, potential therapeutic uses for VR, the strengths and limitations of VR in this context, and the practicalities of delivering VR therapy. Suggested therapeutic uses were to practice challenging situations around food-related and weight/appearance-related scenarios and interactions, to retrain attention, the representation of the body, to represent the eating disorder, for psychoeducation, and to enable therapeutic conversations with oneself. There was a substantial agreement between the groups on these themes. Conclusions: People with lived experience of eating disorders and clinicians with experience in treating eating disorders generated many ideas as to how VR could be used as a part of eating disorders treatment. They were also aware of potential limitations and expressed the need for caution around how bodies are represented in a VR setting.

Indexed as

anorexia nervosabulimia nervosaclinicianseating disordersEDNOSimmersivelimitationspsychoeducationqualitative datatherapeutictreatmentvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41341870
PMCPMC12671292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.