ArticleBrain & spine2025
Full-endoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal approach for the devastating spondylodiscitis with psoas abscess.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spondylodiscitis with psoas abscess is a serious spinal infection often requiring prolonged antibiotics and surgery in some instances. Conventional surgical approaches can be highly invasive, posing significant risks to frail patients with multiple comorbidities. An endoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal approach offers a potential minimally invasive alternative to reduce surgical trauma. Research question: Can an endoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal approach effectively and safely treat spondylodiscitis with psoas abscess, particularly in high-risk patients? Materials and methods: This retrospective case series included patients treated for psoas abscess via an endoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal approach between 2013 and 2023. The collected data included demographic details, comorbidities, operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain scores, spinal injury scale outcomes, time to normalization of laboratory markers, and 6-month satisfaction scores. Results: Of 81 patients with spinal infections who underwent surgery, nine met the inclusion criteria (mean age 65.67 ± 10.6 years). Spinal stabilization was performed in seven cases. Mean operative time was 149.44 ± 63.05 min, and mean blood loss was 88.89 ± 117.59 mL. Significant pain reduction was observed postoperatively, and 88.89 % of patients maintained or improved spinal injury scores at 1-year follow-up. Laboratory markers normalized within 1 week to 1 month in most cases. At 6 months, 77.78 % reported good to excellent satisfaction. Discussion and conclusion: The endoscopic-assisted retroperitoneal approach is a feasible and promising option for managing spondylodiscitis with psoas abscess, offering reduced tissue damage, favorable recovery times, and encouraging clinical outcomes. It may be particularly advantageous for frail patients with multiple comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.