ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
What might influence the elderly willingness to participate in "shared elderly care"? A mixed methods study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of Photostimulation Therapy in Cognitive Function of Alzheimer's Disease Patients: A Scoping Review.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the core factors influencing participation in the "shared elderly care" model among urban Chinese seniors and propose targeted solutions to address the challenges of an aging society. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 533 seniors in Zhengzhou. Data on demographic characteristics, health literacy, and environmental factors were analyzed using four machine learning algorithms: logistic regression, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine. Approximately 3 years later, qualitative validation was conducted through six focus group interviews. Themes were extracted using Colaizzi phenomenological analysis, and the predictions were validated. Results: Five hundred valid questionnaires were collected. The machine learning algorithm results showed that the random forest model had the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.652), revealing that e-health literacy and policy awareness were key drivers (jointly explaining 24.1% of the variance in participation intention), with age, environmental sensitivity, and social influence as significant cofactors. Qualitative analysis confirmed that technology usability and a sense of social belonging were core experiential elements of deep participation. Conclusion: Addressing the primary obstacles of digital literacy gaps and limited technological accessibility, we propose three countermeasures: increasing publicity and promotion of shared elderly care models; conducting community digital health literacy training; and increasing resource allocation to precisely match needs, thus providing an implementation path for building an inclusive shared elderly care ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.