ReviewTelemedicine reports2025
Telemedicine Use Among Older Adults During COVID-19: A Narrative Literature Review of Utilization Patterns.
Review in Telemedicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Willingness for video visits for non-emergent health issues, mental health, or specialty visits.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the rapid expansion of telemedicine services during the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns have emerged about equitable access for vulnerable populations, including older adults. This narrative literature review aims to examine patterns of telemedicine use among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States (U.S.). Methods: A comprehensive review of 55 articles published between 2020 and 2024 was conducted to analyze disparities in older adult telemedicine use around the COVID-19 pandemic. Data from electronic health records and medical claims data were compiled for analysis. Variations based on visit modalities, geographic regions and divisions, age categorization, and medical specialties were explored. Results: Most studies found lower use among older adults, with 23 reporting significantly reduced usage compared with younger groups. Only 11 showed higher use, while 12 found no difference or had inconclusive results, and 11 did not include an in-person comparison group. A total of 26 studies used a single cross-sectional design, and 29 used multiple cross-sectional designs. Research was primarily conducted in the Northeast and West, U.S., with most studies analyzing telephone, video, and in-person visits ( Conclusions: This review reveals persistent disparities in telemedicine use among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the need for research into contributing factors and targeted strategies to improve access. Policymakers should consider initiatives such as financial support, broadband expansion, and digital literacy programs to promote equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.