ReviewEJVES vascular forum2025
Definition of Carotid Artery Free Floating Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Call for Standardisation of Imaging and Nomenclature.
Review in EJVES vascular forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Carotid Free-Floating Thrombus: A Case Series, Narrative Review, and Proposal for Biology-Guided Treatment Selection.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Free floating thrombus in the carotid artery (cFFT) is a rare and poorly understood condition with an unclear definition and diagnostic criteria. This systematic review aimed to propose a reporting standard to ensure diagnostic consistency and a universal definition of cFFT. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception until 01 May 2025, using terms including "free floating thrombus" and "carotid", along with imaging modalities. Eligibility criteria included studies on patients with cFFT, diagnosed through well defined imaging criteria. Two authors independently screened eligible literature and extracted data. Study quality was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score. The composite endpoint was the radiological description of cFFT per imaging modality. Results: A systematic search identified 611 publications, from which 20 were included. These studies were predominantly of low quality, with a mean MINORS score of 9 for non-comparative and 16 for comparative studies. These 20 studies identified 17 distinct imaging based descriptions of cFFT. The descriptions were derived from five different imaging modalities, encompassing both static and dynamic imaging. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was the most reported modality, followed by duplex ultrasound (DUS). On CTA, cFFT is diagnosed as a thrombus with circumferential flow, proximal attachment to the vessel wall, and extending distally in the lumen. On DUS, cFFT is diagnosed by circumferential flow, attachment to the arterial wall, and synchronous movement with the cardiac cycle. Conclusion: The published literature lacks high quality studies. It is suggested that the diagnosis of cFFT requires static imaging, preferably with CTA. If static imaging is inconclusive, a dedicated dynamic assessment by DUS, performed by an experienced sonographer, is suggested. The proposed definition aims to standardise the diagnostic workflow for cFFT, thereby ensuring consistent interpretation and unified terminology across research and clinical practice, which should also enhance individual patient data meta-analyses on cFFT in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.