Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41341800›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2025

User, Admission and Discharge Characteristics at Secure Units in Residential Social Care Institutions in Slovenia.

Juš Škraban, Katja Prevodnik, Andreja Rafaelič

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juš ŠkrabanFaculty of Social Work, University of Ljubljana, Topniška ulica 31, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5883-6957
Katja PrevodnikSocial Protection Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Tržaška 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-6258
Andreja RafaeličSocial Protection Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Tržaška 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7108-6915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate data on users, the characteristics of admission, placement and discharge of individuals in secure units. These are locked units in special residential institutions in the social care sector. Methods: A total population descriptive study was performed. In April 2024, a questionnaire comprising 72 items was sent to all six institutions with secure units in the field of mental health and intellectual disabilities. Data from 2023 were gathered. Descriptive and univariate analysis were applied. Results: A total of 64% of users were male, and the mean age was 54.3 years. The vast majority of users (98%) were admitted involuntarily and deprived of their legal capacity (67%). The largest proportion of users were admitted following admission into a psychiatric hospital (44%), admission to open units of the same institution (34%) and living in the community (10%). The mean length of stay in the secure unit was 64.01 months. During the placement in secure units, 14% of users were admitted to a psychiatric hospital. Only 17% users were discharged from secure units, with 81% taking place later, while 19% discharges took place before the expiry of a court order. The most common location of discharge was the open unit of the same institution (79%). Conclusions: The results highlight high rates of involuntary admissions, prolonged stays and limited transitions to community care, raising public health and human rights concerns. The findings call for a shift in focus from expanding institutional capacity towards improving discharge practices and strengthening community-based support.

Indexed as

CoercionInstitutionalisationIntellectual disabilityInvoluntary admissionMental healthRights

Identifiers

PMID41341800
PMCPMC12671545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.