ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Distinct and complementary mechanisms of oscillatory and aperiodic alpha activity in visuospatial attention.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alpha oscillations are thought to play a key role in visuospatial attention, particularly through lateralisation mechanisms. However, whether this function is driven purely by oscillatory activity or also involves aperiodic neural components remains unclear, making it difficult to develop precise theoretical models of alpha function and attention. Using EEG and concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-EEG, this study aimed to (1) disentangle the contributions of oscillatory and aperiodic alpha activity to visuospatial attention and (2) examine their causal roles by differentially modulating aperiodic and oscillatory components. First, across four independent EEG datasets, we found that both aperiodic and oscillatory alpha activity contribute to spatial attention encoding and univariate lateralisation effects. The two signals were uncorrelated across electrodes and their combination yielded stronger lateralisation effects than either signal separately, suggesting that they may play complementary roles. Then, we used concurrent TMS-EEG to modulate the two signals. Compared with arrhythmic TMS (ar-TMS), rhythmic TMS (rh-TMS) enhanced oscillatory alpha power, especially at the stimulated area, while decreasing aperiodic alpha power across the scalp. Despite these opposing effects, rh-TMS improved visuospatial attention representation carried by both oscillatory and aperiodic alpha signals, suggesting that both signals may reflect attentional processing. Moreover, TMS-induced changes in oscillatory and aperiodic alpha decoding differentially predicted behavioural performance, with TMS-induced changes in oscillatory alpha decoding correlating with response errors and changes in aperiodic alpha decoding correlating with response speed. Together these findings reveal a functional dissociation between oscillatory and aperiodic activity in the alpha band. We suggest a dual mechanism for alpha band activity in supporting visuospatial attention, where the two components have distinct but complementary roles. Oscillatory components may primarily support attentional filtering and target prioritisation, while aperiodic components may reflect overall neural excitability and cognitive efficiency. Both of these mechanisms contribute to successful visuospatial attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.